tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4513524515428334509.post7885304937149284295..comments2024-03-26T10:41:35.852+00:00Comments on The 1709 Blog: Resale rights: the Dali rulingMarie-Andree Weisshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17125973798789498436noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4513524515428334509.post-44400125865423470292010-12-19T07:26:29.012+00:002010-12-19T07:26:29.012+00:00According to the Court of Justice, there was nothi...According to the Court of Justice, there was nothing in Article 6(1) to stop the French limiting the benefit of the resale right to the author's heirs, even if that was to the exclusion of legatees or other successors in title.<a href="http://www.plrprivatelabelrights.com/plr-reports" rel="nofollow">www.plrprivatelabelrights.com/plr-reports</a>Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05971584251706444928noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4513524515428334509.post-39694379151289940362010-10-03T21:28:06.810+01:002010-10-03T21:28:06.810+01:00The ruling was prompted by French proceedings in w...The ruling was prompted by French proceedings in which the court wanted to know whether resale right royalties for French sales of Salvador Dalí's works should be payable to (i) the sole legatee appointed in the painter's will -- this being his Fundación -- or (ii) his legal heirs, as French domestic law requires. According to Article 6(1) of the Directive, Member States had to introduce the resale right by 1 January 2006, entitling an artist or, after death, "those entitled under him" to receive that royalty when their original works of art were resold. But what did "those entitled under him" mean?<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />[url=http://www.plrprivatelabelrights.com] resell rights[/url]jhonsmithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05193595613739250801noreply@blogger.com