tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4513524515428334509.post8616504454546611028..comments2024-03-26T10:41:35.852+00:00Comments on The 1709 Blog: Copyright protection and algorithmsMarie-Andree Weisshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17125973798789498436noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4513524515428334509.post-38354065982732502672012-08-19T17:17:23.353+01:002012-08-19T17:17:23.353+01:00I've received the following information from F...I've received the following information from Franck Macrez, who writes:<br /><br />I wrote a paper, but : <br />- it's in French<br />- it's talking about copyright / software patent cumulation<br /><br />But maybe a few elements at ยง17-18 and 22-23<br />And the conclusion is the non-protectability of algorithms as a general principle of law (copyright, patent, unfair competition...)<br /><br />http://franck.macrez.net/?p=182<br />http://franckmacrez.online.fr/wp-content/uploads/DALLOZ_4.Macrez_Final.pdf<br />Jeremyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01123244020588707776noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4513524515428334509.post-73433005143062641082012-08-13T18:40:19.228+01:002012-08-13T18:40:19.228+01:00For some discussion, e e.g. the recent comment of ...For some discussion, e e.g. the recent comment of the SAS case in EIPR by D. Gervais and I : The scope of computer program protection after SAS: are we closer to answers? EIPR. 34(8), pp. 565-572.Estelle Derclayenoreply@blogger.com