The
Economist recently published an interesting article on copyright in space,
asking which jurisdiction Commander Hadfield was in when he recorded the video,
broadcast it live and subsequently uploaded it to YouTube? In practice
Commander Hadfield had permission to perform and distribute the song, however
for those who are interested, The Economist explains that the law which governs
the International Space Station depends on which part of the station an
astronaut is in. Commander Hadfield apparently made the recording in the
Destiny module (owned by NASA), the Cupola (now also owned by NASA, but
previously owned by the ESA) and the exciting sounding Japanese Experiment
Module (developed by JAXA), meaning that US and Japanese laws could have applied.
With technology
making both space travel and content broadcast more commonplace, is how the law
applies in space something we need to give more thought to? Answers on the back
of a postcard please!
In 1709 (or was it 1710?) the Statute of Anne created the first purpose-built copyright law. This blog, founded just 300 short and unextended years later, is dedicated to all things copyright, warts and all.
Showing posts with label international space station. Show all posts
Showing posts with label international space station. Show all posts
Tuesday, 4 June 2013
Copyright in Space
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)