Two main streams of action have been recommended:
© Faye Fujiko |
2. Introduction of measures aimed at reconciling disparate national levy systems within the Single
Market. In particular Vitorino recommends:
- Collecting levies in cross-border transactions in the Member
State in which the final customer resides;
- Shifting the liability to pay levies from manufacturers and
importers to retailers provided that the tariff systems are simplified and that
manufacturers and importers are obliged to inform collecting societies about
their transactions concerning goods subject to a levy. Alternatively he
recommends establishing clear and predictable exemption schemes for those
operators that should in principle not bear liability;
- Placing more emphasis, in the field of reprography, on operator
levies than on hardware-based levies;
- Making levies visible to the final consumer;
- Ensuring greater consistency with regard to the process of
setting levies, notably by defining "harm" uniformly across the EU
and by simplifying the procedural framework in which levies are set.
How long any changes take to implement (if indeed any are
implemented) remains to be seen, however it is clear that changes do need to be
made to give some sort of consistency to the current disparate levies applied
across Europe. By way of example the press release sets out some of the levies
which applied in 2010:
|
Blank
DVD
|
MP3
player
|
France
|
€ 1.00
|
€ 1.00-20.00
|
Denmark
|
€ 0.4
|
no levy
|
Germany
|
€ 0.0139
|
€ 5.00
|
Poland
|
2.5 % of the sales price
|
3% of the sales price
|
Lithuania
|
6% of the import price
|
€ 0.43-11.58
|
Barnier confirmed that the recommendations will be taken into
account in any further steps to be taken regarding private copying and
reprography levies, and in particular in the on-going review of the EU
copyright framework. He also reminded us (lest we forget!): "Copyright law
and licensing practices need to remain fit for the 21st century."
1 comment:
Did they really ignore the problem of replacements and RAIDs? If your harddrive brakes down/is replaced, you are charged another levy AGAIN - although you do not create extra copies. You just replace drive A with drive A'. There is no justification to charge for the same copy x times.
Likewise, if you run a RAID, you have x drives but not x copies of the file. Why charge x levies?
These are massive issued that need to be adressed!.
Post a Comment