1709 Blog: for all the copyright community

Saturday, 30 November 2013

Implementing the Orphan Works Directive: the case of Hungary

There is little doubt that 1709 Blog readers will be spending the coming months (especially the forthcoming holidays/end of year celebrations) thinking about future national implementations of Directive 2012/28/EU on certain permitted uses of orphan works [the Orphan Works Directive. By the way: have you remembered to vote in the IPKat/1709 Blog joint poll? You can find it on the left hand side of the IPKat sidebar poll]

Some Member States have already taken steps to implement the Directive into their national laws. 

Hungary is one of these, as 1709 Blog friend and copyright enthusiast Péter Munkácsi (Hungarian Ministry of Justice and Public Administration) reports:

"Act CLVIX. of 2013 (also known as 2013 II. IP Amendment Act) contains provisions (Articles 5, 16, 24, 26 ('EU clause') and 27 b)) that have amended Hungarian copyright law to implement part of the Orphan Work Directive. All changes will entry into force on 29 October 2014 [this is also the deadline for national implementations of the Directive, as its Article 9 states]. The second phase of the implementation will continue soon. In fact, Article 25 of the 2013 II. IP Amendment Act authorises the Government to determine detailed rules on uses of orphan works, circumstances relating to fair compensation, register issue, etc.

Since 2009 Hungary has had an orphan works scheme, whose main features include the following:

·         On the basis of the extended licensing system managed by collective management organisations users can obtain licenses for the use of orphan works. However, the rights in works which are under collective rights management are excluded from the scope of the orphan works licensing scheme;
·         Granting licences for the use of an orphan work is within the competences of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO). Licences for the use of orphan works may only be granted for a term not exceeding five years, are only valid in Hungary, and are non-exclusive and non-transferable;
·         Hungarian legislation provides for a publicly available administrative register on orphan works, which is administered by the HIPO;

During the various stages which eventually led to the [partial] implementation of the Directive, an examination was undertaken as regards existing licensing scheme and its relationship with the forthcoming exception or limitation to the rights of reproduction and making available to public, pursuant to Article 6 of the Directive. 

As a result of this reflection, the Act introduces a new Chapter IV/A in the Copyright Act with the title “Uses of Orphan Works”. This Chapter is divided into 3 sub-chapters: (i) General Provisions; (ii) The Licensing for the Use of Orphan Works; (iii) The Use of Orphan Works by Beneficiary Institutions.

Under the “General Provisions”, new Article 41/A(1) defines what orphan works are. The definition complements the elements of the existing licensing system with circumstances relating to the notions of diligent search and good faith. A work or other subject matter shall be considered an orphan, if its rightsholder cannot be identified or located, following an unsuccessful search carried out diligently and in good faith. A separate piece of legislation (to be adopted at the stage of further implementation) will determine the sources which are appropriate for the conduction of a diligent search.

An infamous case of restoration
The main part of the implementation of the directive is “The Use of Orphan Works by Beneficiary Institutions” sub-chapter. Beneficiary institutions (publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museums, archives, picture or audio archives, and public media service provider radio and television organisations) will be allowed to use orphan works contained in their collections (archives) for the purpose of digitising and making them available to the public without the need of a licence, if these uses are made in accordance with their public-interest missions, and are intended for the preservation and restoration of, or educational and cultural access to their collections.  
Among other things, orphan works include phonograms, cinematographic works or other audiovisual works produced by the public media service provider radio and television organisations up to 31 December 2002 and included in their archives. These works shall be those first published in the EEA or, in the absence of publication, first broadcast in the EEA.

Beneficiaries can   
(i)      make orphan works available to the public in a way that allows the members of the public to choose individually the place and time of access;
(ii)     reproduce orphan works freely for the purposes of digitisation, making available to the public as is stated above, indexing, cataloguing, preservation or restoration.

Public/private partnerships will be possible, in compliance with Article 6(4) of the Directive."

1 comment:

Donald Stevens said...

A small edit to Dr. Munkácsi's post: the statute is actually Act CLIX of 2013, not CLVIX. The statute is available in Hungarian at http://www.kozlonyok.hu/nkonline/MKPDF/hiteles/MK13172.pdf.

Otherwise, thanks for the very helpful post!