Is Warner Bro's Westworld game a blatant rip-off?
Social network, media company, host provider, neutral intermediary... what's in a name for YouTube?
Austria's former Chancellor Christian Kern appears on Puls4 TV.
For creatives in California, a recent employment law case may raise concerns over copyright
Nowhere in the 85-page judgement is “copyright” or even “intellectual property” mentioned.
What does this mean for copyright law? The rise of the gig economy, which is characterised by short-term contracts and freelance work, poses new questions for intellectual property ownership. To determine if someone is an employee for purposes of copyright authorship, American Federal courts currently use a test in the US Treasury Department’s Internal Revenue Service code.
For participants in the gig economy, the Dynamex ruling could simply prompt media and software companies to hire fewer independent contractors, and instead only hire people as employees. Although the copyright implications of Dynamex are unknown, the decision underscores the need for employers and workers alike to ensure that any contract for services includes a carefully drafted intellectual property rights clause – especially for those in creative industries.