The estate of Lella and Massimo Vignelli,
represented by their daughter Valentina Vignelli, and Vignelli Designs, which
hold the intellectual property rights in the Vignellis’designs, have filed a
copyright and trademark infringement suit in the Southern District of New York against
publishers Rizzoli and Mondadori, and Beatriz Cifuentes, a former employee of
the Vignellis.
The case is The Estate of Massimo and Elena
Vignelli et al v. Rizzoli International Publications, Inc. et al, No
1:19-cv-01584.
Defendants are the publishers and the
author of a book published
last October, which allegedly used without permission 102 original sketches made
by Massimo Vignelli and misrepresented that the book was co-designed by Massimo
Vignelli and is endorsed by the Vignelli Estate.
Lella
and Massimo Vignelli
Lella and Massimo Vignelli’s designs are
known by New York subway riders as the couple designed the now iconic subway signage.
The map
designed in 1972 is no longer in use, as many
riders complained it was difficult to understand, but the train
numbers of the lines are still in use. The Vignellis also designed Bloomingdale’s
logo and its brown paper shopping bag. Some
of their works are part of the MoMA collections.
They worked together in New York until
Massimo Vignelli’s death in 2014. Lella Vignelli died two years later. Their estate
is now handling their intellectual property rights.
The
1990 book
Massimo Vignelli often designed books and even
wrote a book about the topic, “The
Vignelli Cannon.” In 1990, he designed a book published by Rizzoli, “design:Vignelli”
and also designed the logo on the cover. Plaintiff claims that this logo “became the distinctive trade dress of the
VIGNELLI brand.” In any case, Massimo Vignelli retained the intellectual
property rights in it.
The book is registered with the U.S.
Copyright Office as a compilation of the texts and photos and contains testimonies
about the Vignellis’ work from various writers and photographers. These contributors
retained their own rights.
The
2018 book
Beatriz Cifuentes joined Vignelli
Associates in 2004 and worked there as a graphic designer. After Lella Vignelli
died, and according to the couple’s wishes, the Vignellis’ professional
artifacts and a portion of their personal artifacts were sent to the Vignelli
Archives.
According to the complaint, the Vignellis’
children found out at that time that Beatriz Cifuentes had kept personal
property belonging to Massimo Vignelli that needed to be returned to the
Vignelli Archive, including some sketches, which had not yet been published,
but which were published in the 2018 book.
Beatriz Cifuentes wrote in the introduction
to the 2018 book “on his death bed,
Massimo [Vignelli] made [her] promise [she] would
finish the book.” However, according to the Complaint, Massimo Vignelli’s
will does have a provision about the book.
The
copyright infringement claims
The Complaint alleges that permission was
not sought to use material for this book, and that Defendants had denied their requests
to remove Massimo Vignelli’s name from the design credit, to include an
“erratum slip” and to make sure that the press releases and promotional
material were corrected.
It also alleges that Defendants reproduced
without permission works authored by Massimo Vignelli, and also reproduced essays
and photographs of third parties without their permission [these third parties
are not parties to this suit, at least not yet. This is a classic copyright
infringement claim.
The 1990 book is registered as a compilation,
which are protectable by copyright. The Copyright Act defines them as being “formed by the collection and assembling of
preexisting materials or of data that are selected, coordinated, or arranged in
such a way that the resulting work as a whole constitutes an original work of
authorship.” However, as explained
by the Copyright Office in 2012, such compilation must result in one or more of
the congressionally-established categories of authorship to be registered. This is the case here, as the book is a
literary work and also features graphic works.
Plaintiffs also allege that “Defendants prepared a compilation using
unpublished works of Massimo Vignelli that were obtained without Plaintiffs’
authorization and then published by Defendants for the first time with the
release of the 2018 Book on October 23, 2018.”
Unpublished works can be protected by
copyright. Nevertheless, it is the author who has the exclusive right to
publicly display the work. Beatriz Cifuentes claims that Massimo Vignelli
wanted her to publish his works. This will be important to prove as a defense
to the suit. Defendants could still claim fair use, whether permission to
publish was granted or not. However, the Supreme Court explained in 1985 that the
courts are less likely to find fair use if the work was unpublished, Harper
& Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters. As a reminder, U.S.
copyright law provides a very limited moral right to visual artists. Italian
law, however, provides such rights, and it will be interesting to see if
Plaintiffs will try to access it.
Plaintiffs are asking the court, inter
alia, to permanently enjoin Defendants from further copying, marketing, publishing,
selling, making derivative works, or otherwise commercially exploiting the works
and the 2018 book.
The Defendants may now choose to defend
themselves in court, or to settle.
Photo is courtesy of Flickr user Jonathan
Wilsson under a CC
BY-NC 2.0 license.
No comments:
Post a Comment