The First Circuit Court Of Appeals has
rejected the appeal by file sharer Joel Tenenbaum and has upheld the original
damages awarded to the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) against
the post graduate student of $675,000, rejecting the argument that being
ordered to pay $22,500 in damages for each of the 31 songs that were illegally
uploaded was excessive. The US Supreme Court had refused to consider the case.
The court said: "Tenenbaum carried on his activities for years in spite of
numerous warnings, he made thousands of songs available illegally, and he
denied responsibility during discovery. Much of this behaviour was exactly what
Congress was trying to deter when it amended the Copyright Act".
Germany has introduced new legislation that
limits damages that copyright holders
can receive from individuals using illegal file-sharing sites to
download music, films or TV series. The legislation limits individual claims to €1,000 ($1,300), meaning the warning fine for a first-time offender, to cover
legal expenses, would be capped at around €155 ($200). A poll by the Federation
of German Consumer Organizations estimated that some 4.3 million Germans had received warnings for infringement,
some demanding an average of $1,000
(€800) per offence: Germany’s Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger said the
move would stop company’s building ’business
models’ out of warnings.And more from Germany and In what appears to be a trolling case, a German court has rejected a US film company's request to provide details of alleged illegal downloaders after deciding that there was no copyright in two pornographic films. The Munich regional court decided that the "primitive" depiction of sex meant that Flexible Beauty” and “Young Passion” could not be protected by Intellectual property laws in Germany saying that the “primitive depiction of sexual processes” mean Malibu Media's films are classified as “pure pornography” and not a copyrighted work. But what about performers rights anyone?
Universal Music Publishing has mandated the Australasian Performing Right Association (APRA) and its mechanical rights sister body AMCOS to licence its songs catalogue to digital services throughout almost all of the Asia Pacific region, excluding Japan. The landmark arrangement means APRA/AMCOS will be the first collecting society to represent a major publisher's catalogue in multiple territories in the Asia Pacific market.
![]() |
| Keef Rocks Glastonbury |
Image: Nick Cordes 2013



1 comment:
> but gives no clues as to who owns what either.
Hey, that's simple: posterity owns both lyrics. As for who gets to temporarily collect money in its name, I can't help you there, not being a lawyer. :-)
Post a Comment