data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9027f/9027f957da53771e639b3dfb726d8c938c64e4db" alt=""
Although telecommunication companies have expressed concern over who will be paying the financial costs associated with blocking infringing website (and any legal proceedings that may arise after a website or a business gets erroneously blocked) the Bill is not expected to face major opposition or amendment before it is passed ito law. Four amendments were made to the initial draft, which is supported by both the Labour party and the ruling Coalition, although the Greens have objected to the Bill and in a dissenting report the Green's Senator Ludlum said the Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Bill 2015 was the "latest in a long line of misguided attempts by the government to monitor, control and censor the internet".
Communications Alliance chief executive officer John Stanton said the government should carry through on its earlier commitments concerning costs requiring that "Rights holders would be required to meet any reasonable costs associated with an ISP giving effect to an order [to block a website]...' "
The effectiveness of the new regime would be reviewed after two years of operation.
http://au.idigitaltimes.com/australian-senate-approves-online-copyright-bill-101429 and http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Copyright_Bill_2015/Report
No comments:
Post a Comment