In 1709 (or was it 1710?) the Statute of Anne created the first purpose-built copyright law. This blog, founded just 300 short and unextended years later, is dedicated to all things copyright, warts and all.
Thursday, 23 December 2010
Spain rejects 'US influenced' copyright bill
After a narrow vote, a Spanish parliamentary commission has rejected a controversial bill aimed at protecting content owners from internet downloaders. All of the main Spanish parties, except for Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero's Socialists rejected the so-called Sinde Bill, named after Culture Minister Angeles Gonzalez-Sinde. The draft legislation would have set up a government commission which would have then provided courts with details of websites offering access to copyright-protected material such as music, movies, video games or software. A judge could then have ordered the closure of offending websites.
The bill sparked furious opposition from internet users who accused the government of violating the freedom of expression but Gonzalez-Sinde said the law only intended to put an end to Spain's position as a 'paradise of piracy.' Techdirt put a different slant on things, firstly praising Spain’s “somewhat more reasonable copyright laws than other parts of the world” highlighting provisions that say that “personal, non-commercial copying is not against the law and also says that third parties should not be liable for copyright infringement done by their users” adding that obviously Hollywood ‘hates’ this and that Spain's recently introduced reform package seemed like a “checklist of the entertainment industry's wishes" and that one of the recent Wikileaks diplomatic cable leaks showed that “US diplomats played a role in pressuring the Spanish government to make these changes, at the behest of movie industry lobbyists”.
Labels: copyright infringement, music piracy, Spain
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Your post totally ignores the fact that Spain legislated, in 2006, a tax on blank media of all forms, making their copyright paradigm similar to that of Canada (where, because of a similar tax, downloading music for personal use is legal).
The content industries are seeing the writing on the wall, and trying at all costs to squeeze out a few extra dollars to replace those which they are losing from many reasons, only one of which is the ever and ever increasing ease with which copyright can be infringed. Other factors include: (1) the market gradually being diluted by the ever-increasing supply of older content (which now doesn't degrade as it did before), (2) the fragmentation of the market as advances in communication make it easier for people to find niche content, (3) the huge increase in free non-professional content and cheap independent content, (4) the industry's relative monopoly of control on media marketing channels like radio being subverted by much more widely open channels made possible by the rise of the net, (5) consumers have more information about new media products, whether through better inter-communication, the increasing ease of finding snippet preview, or the use of one-time copyright infringement as "tasting".
Post a Comment