To add to Ben Challis’ report from Portcullis House, the event attendees were provided with a useful four page leaflet produced by Pictfor, co-the organisers of the event, for Consumer Focus . It led with the reminder that Recommendation 3 of Professor Hargreaves Report recommended that codes of practice for societies be introduced on the basis that the UK should be supporting moves in Europe for "a framework for cross border copyright licensing". Chris Johnstone from Music Choice, explained that the 2003 Music Choice complaint to Europe had been based upon a European licensing situation whereby potential digital users had to acquire licences for musical works from 4 j-v digital licensing bodies and 27 societies – and that is before one begins on the record labels. And British Copyright Council President, Maureen Duffy, reminded us that that the UK cannot possibly address this without reference to the plethora of international treaties and bodies (and anagrams) that operate in the sphere of IP regulation. Frances Lowe from PRS for Music, stressed that there was transparency of licensing tariff calculation – for users – and transparency of revenue calculations – for right owners. These are both commercially sensitive and need to be considered separately. These monopolies are managing a few strands of monopolistic rights and they have to serve both the user and the owner constituencies all the while balancing competition considerations against the demands of the single market.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/715ee/715ee53322eb90727f194feea2b0daaed4338ffd" alt=""
1 comment:
Ms. Gloria Braga from this Brazilian organization, ECAD, explained their model in the recent WIPO conference on copyright documentation and infrastructure. Her presentation, and a sound recording of it, is available at
http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/2011/wipo_cr_doc_ge_11/prov_program.html
Best,
Victoriano Colodrón
RightsDirect
Vict
Post a Comment