The Abe government is seeking to abolish wartime copyright extensions in negotiations on the protection of intellectual property rights as part of Trans-Pacific Partnership multilateral free trade talks. In talks with the United States, Japan is demanding that the special arrangements be scrapped if the period of protection for copyrighted works of art is extended under a TPP deal, informed sources said.This blogger has not hitherto come across anything about Japanese wartime copyright extensions and wonders if readers can contribute any useful information or practical experience of it/
1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty on the grounds that the copyrights of productions in the allied nations had not been protected in Japan during the war.
Among the 12 countries participating in the TPP talks, the United States, Australia and New Zealand are covered by the wartime copyright extensions.
TPP minister Akira Amari, told a meeting of the Liberal Democratic Party in early July that talks with the United States were touching on the advisability of ending the wartime copyright extensions.
The TPP negotiations have been exploring extending the period of copyright protection from the current 50 years to 70 years.
“Japan should not miss this opportunity to demand the correction of the situation that only selected countries have the benefit of very long copyright protection,” a specialist on the Copyright Act said.
Abolition of the wartime copyright extensions for European countries such as Britain and France may be discussed in negotiations between Japan and the European Union on concluding an economic partnership agreement.
In 1709 (or was it 1710?) the Statute of Anne created the first purpose-built copyright law. This blog, founded just 300 short and unextended years later, is dedicated to all things copyright, warts and all.
Monday, 20 July 2015
Japan: land of the rising sun and the shrinking copyright?
"Japan trying to end wartime copyright extensions under TPP" is a snippet of news that this blogger would surely have missed, were it not for the eagle eye of Chris Torrero (thanks!) who kindly furnished this link to the Japan Times. In short:
Labels: Japan, wartime copyright extensions
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Would this Japanese demand, if met, help straighten out terms of copyright globally a bit? It has been questioned how far the E.U. Term Directive succeeded in this regard, even within Europe. On Japanese wartime extensions, see T. Ueno and T. Doi, "Japan" § 3[b], in L. Bently (ed.), INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT LAW AND PRACTICE (LexisNexis, 2015).
Post a Comment